RE: [registrars] Boardrooms requires reason for voting "no"

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

The ballot for the proposed amendment works the same, so the problem
sort of cancels itself out.

Tim 
 

 -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [registrars] Boardrooms requires reason for voting "no"
From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, April 28, 2006 9:23 am
To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I am happy with that if voting "yes" also requires putting a blank in
the other box.

Yours,
Marcus


> At 06:13 AM 4/28/06, Marcus Faure wrote:
> >I just tried to vote no on the gnso task force contract issues
> >ballot. Boardrooms wants me to specify a reason for that vote. I think
> >we had this before and we required boardrooms staff to change
> >this. Anyway, it should be fixed.
> 
> Dear Marcus and others:  Just vote.  Put anything in the comment box you 
> want to.  I think you can even put a space in it, e.g. " ".  Regards, BobC
> 
>