Re: [registrars] Boardrooms requires reason for voting "no"

["Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

thanks for the constructive input, but I will not try this. The
"difficulty level" of all options should be the same. If you do not
have to select anything for a yes, I expect the same for a no. 
I have no problem specifying a reason or selecting something, but it
appears to be inappropriate to demand it on one side but not the other.

Yours,
Marcus

> I believe you have to select the document on the bottom of the form as
> it relates to the PDP-Feb 06
> 
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marcus Faure
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 9:13 AM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] Boardrooms requires reason for voting "no"
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just tried to vote no on the gnso tark force contract issues
> ballot. Boardrooms wants me to specify a reason for that vote. I think
> we had this before and we required boardrooms staff to change
> this. Anyway, it should be fixed.
> 
> Yours,
> Marcus
> 
>