<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Boardrooms requires reason for voting "no"
- To: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Boardrooms requires reason for voting "no"
- From: "Jeffrey Eckhaus" <jeckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:21:18 -0400
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcZqxnxtD2D1XDxpQI2pggHVMZkIeAAABNAg
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Boardrooms requires reason for voting "no"
I believe you have to select the document on the bottom of the form as
it relates to the PDP-Feb 06
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marcus Faure
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 9:13 AM
To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [registrars] Boardrooms requires reason for voting "no"
Hi,
I just tried to vote no on the gnso tark force contract issues
ballot. Boardrooms wants me to specify a reason for that vote. I think
we had this before and we required boardrooms staff to change
this. Anyway, it should be fixed.
Yours,
Marcus
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|