ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Boardrooms requires reason for voting "no"

  • To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] Boardrooms requires reason for voting "no"
  • From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:23:34 +0200 (CEST)
  • Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <6.2.1.2.2.20060428064134.04889c00@mail.spamarrest.com> from "Robert F. Connelly" at "Apr 28, 2006 06:43:58 am"
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I am happy with that if voting "yes" also requires putting a blank in
the other box.

Yours,
Marcus


> At 06:13 AM 4/28/06, Marcus Faure wrote:
> >I just tried to vote no on the gnso task force contract issues
> >ballot. Boardrooms wants me to specify a reason for that vote. I think
> >we had this before and we required boardrooms staff to change
> >this. Anyway, it should be fixed.
> 
> Dear Marcus and others:  Just vote.  Put anything in the comment box you 
> want to.  I think you can even put a space in it, e.g. " ".  Regards, BobC
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>