<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Boardrooms requires reason for voting "no"
- To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Boardrooms requires reason for voting "no"
- From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:23:34 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <6.2.1.2.2.20060428064134.04889c00@mail.spamarrest.com> from "Robert F. Connelly" at "Apr 28, 2006 06:43:58 am"
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am happy with that if voting "yes" also requires putting a blank in
the other box.
Yours,
Marcus
> At 06:13 AM 4/28/06, Marcus Faure wrote:
> >I just tried to vote no on the gnso task force contract issues
> >ballot. Boardrooms wants me to specify a reason for that vote. I think
> >we had this before and we required boardrooms staff to change
> >this. Anyway, it should be fixed.
>
> Dear Marcus and others: Just vote. Put anything in the comment box you
> want to. I think you can even put a space in it, e.g. " ". Regards, BobC
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|