RE: [registrars] [Fwd: [Lextext] Bret Fausett has a new post on Internet Pro Radio | icann.Blog]

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

<div>Ross, </div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>To clarify one other issue you raised - I did not raise any legal
concerns with Brett. At least, I did not intend to give that
impression. I made a friendly request and Brett was kind enough to
agree to take the recording down. <BR><BR>Tim Ruiz<BR>VP, Domain
Services<BR>The Go Daddy Group, Inc.<BR>Office: 319-294-3940<BR>Fax:
480-247-4516<BR><A
href="mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx";>tim@xxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR><BR><BR></div>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT:
blue 2px solid"><BR>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE:
[registrars] [Fwd: [Lextext] Bret Fausett has a new post<BR>on Internet
Pro Radio | icann.Blog]<BR>From: Tim Ruiz
&lt;tim@xxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Mon, October 31, 2005 6:57 am<BR>To:
ross@xxxxxxxxxx<BR>Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marcus
Faure<BR>&lt;faure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR><BR>
<DIV>The invitation was sent to the Registrars list as an invitation to
Registrars.&nbsp;This is of course&nbsp;a public list and some may feel
that it is then appropriate to attend these calls without announcing
themselves, and to record them without informing the participants that
they are being recorded.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Some of you may not have a problem with that. I do.
IMHO,&nbsp;*ALL* participants on these calls should be announced. And
*ALL* pariticipants should be informed&nbsp;whether or not such call is
going to be recorded, or otherwise become part of some public record.
Brett was on both calls. I don't know about the second call, but he
neither announced himself or informed anyone, including the ICANN
staff, that the call was being recorded.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>To complain about ICANN conducting itself in a transparent manner
on one hand, and then support the&nbsp;secret recording of
conversations on the other seems a little disingenuous to me.</DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR>Tim Ruiz<BR>VP, Domain Services<BR>The Go Daddy Group,
Inc.<BR>Office: 319-294-3940<BR>Fax: 480-247-4516<BR><A
href="mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx";>tim@xxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR><BR><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT:
blue 2px solid"><BR>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: Re:
[registrars] [Fwd: [Lextext] Bret Fausett has a new post<BR>on Internet
Pro Radio | icann.Blog]<BR>From: Ross Rader
&lt;ross@xxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Sun, October 30, 2005 10:13 am<BR>To:
Marcus Faure &lt;faure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Cc:
registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><BR>I understand that Bret has pulled one
of the recordings because of legal <BR>concerns raised by a person or
persons on the second call.<BR><BR>Which is unfortunate - ICANN has a
mandate to conduct itself in a <BR>transparent manner, my expectation
has always been that these calls are <BR>a part of the public
record.<BR><BR>Marcus Faure wrote:<BR>&gt; Hi,<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; I only
found a recording of the first session which I attended - could<BR>&gt;
someone send a link to the second sessions's mp3?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;
Yours,<BR>&gt; Marcus<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; On Fri, 28 Oct 2005,
Ross Rader wrote:<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt; For those of you that chose not
to participate in the official<BR>&gt;&gt; constituency briefing
sessions scheduled by the ICANN Staff for<BR>&gt;&gt; yesterday, Bret
Fausett has made MP3's of both calls available.<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;
http://blog.lextext.com/blog/_archives/2005/10/27/1327040.html<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;
Special thanks to Bret for the contribution.<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;
-ross<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; </BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>