ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] [Fwd: [Lextext] Bret Fausett has a new post on Internet Pro Radio | icann.Blog]

  • To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] [Fwd: [Lextext] Bret Fausett has a new post on Internet Pro Radio | icann.Blog]
  • From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:57:52 -0700
  • Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marcus Faure <faure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<div>The invitation was sent to the Registrars list as an invitation to
Registrars.&nbsp;This is of course&nbsp;a public list and some may feel
that it is then appropriate to attend these calls without announcing
themselves, and to record them without informing the participants that
they are being recorded.</div>
<div>Some of you may not have a problem with that. I do. IMHO,&nbsp;*ALL*
participants on these calls should be announced. And *ALL*
pariticipants should be informed&nbsp;whether or not such call is going
to be recorded, or otherwise become part of some public record. Brett
was on both calls. I don't know about the second call, but he neither
announced himself or informed anyone, including the ICANN staff, that
the call was being recorded.</div>
<div>To complain about ICANN conducting itself in a transparent manner on
one hand, and then support the&nbsp;secret recording of conversations
on the other seems a little disingenuous to me.</div>
<div><BR><BR>Tim Ruiz<BR>VP, Domain Services<BR>The Go Daddy Group,
Inc.<BR>Office: 319-294-3940<BR>Fax: 480-247-4516<BR><A
blue 2px solid"><BR>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: Re:
[registrars] [Fwd: [Lextext] Bret Fausett has a new post<BR>on Internet
Pro Radio | icann.Blog]<BR>From: Ross Rader
&lt;ross@xxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Sun, October 30, 2005 10:13 am<BR>To:
Marcus Faure &lt;faure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Cc:
registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><BR>I understand that Bret has pulled one
of the recordings because of legal <BR>concerns raised by a person or
persons on the second call.<BR><BR>Which is unfortunate - ICANN has a
mandate to conduct itself in a <BR>transparent manner, my expectation
has always been that these calls are <BR>a part of the public
record.<BR><BR>Marcus Faure wrote:<BR>&gt; Hi,<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; I only
found a recording of the first session which I attended - could<BR>&gt;
someone send a link to the second sessions's mp3?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;
Yours,<BR>&gt; Marcus<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; On Fri, 28 Oct 2005,
Ross Rader wrote:<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt; For those of you that chose not
to participate in the official<BR>&gt;&gt; constituency briefing
sessions scheduled by the ICANN Staff for<BR>&gt;&gt; yesterday, Bret
Fausett has made MP3's of both calls available.<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;
Special thanks to Bret for the contribution.<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt;
-ross<BR>&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; </BLOCKQUOTE>

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>