<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Registry Communication standardization
- To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Registry Communication standardization
- From: "Maria Silva Interdomain Org" <msilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:58:48 +0200
- Cc: "Ray Fassett" <rfassett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcXDnO3B2KEcVSb7TXiA2f0B9OGzQwB/1Lcg
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Registry Communication standardization
Bravin, all
I believe that this is a good idea. We need of course some standardization in all the processes (e mail notifications) with the registries, so we will second any motion in this field.
regards
_____________________________________________________
Maria Silva<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Responsable de Desarrollo de Negocio
Business Development Manager
Interdomain, S.A.
Avda. General Perón, 38 Edif. Master´s II, Plta. 8
28020 Madrid SPAIN
Tel: +34.915848780
Fax: +34.915569793
HYPERLINK "http://www.interdomain.es/"www.interdomain.es
_____________________________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial cuya divulgación esta prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Enviado el: martes, 27 de septiembre de 2005 21:43
Para: Bhavin Turakhia
CC: 'Ray Fassett'; 'Registrars Constituency'
Asunto: RE: [registrars] Registry Communication standardization
Bhavin/Ray,
A separate email address for Transfer dispute issues would also be helpful. I think Registries are currently using the existing list Tina put together for this anyway.
I would also suggest another *general* business bucket for emails that do not fit into one of the other buckets, but are notices to all registrars, or a group of registrars. For example, promotion notices, web conferences, etc.
Other thoughts:
Basically, I would prefer that the Registries never email any of the business, admin, tech, or billing contacts that we provide to them when being accredited with their registry EXCEPT when it is a one-to-one type issue that needs a more immediate notice and/or resolution. So the logic might look something like:
* To multiple registrars - Use the buckets
* To a single registrar regarding a bucket related issue - Use the bucket and the appropriate Registrar Contacts
* To a single registrar regarding a non-bucket issue - Use the appropriate Registrar Contacts
Tim Ruiz
VP, Domain Services
The Go Daddy Group, Inc.
Office: 319-294-3940
Fax: 480-247-4516
HYPERLINK "mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx"tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [registrars] Registry Communication standardization
From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, September 27, 2005 12:35 pm
To: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "'Ray Fassett'" <rfassett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi all,
Based on our joint meeting in Luxembourg, Registries are starting to work on
some of the concern areas that we highlighted to them in our meeting. Ray
Fassett is steering the liaison with our group. The first task at hand is
standardization of the classification of auto generated communication from
Registries.
What we need to provide Ray is a possible set of classifications of auto
generated emails from the Registry.
For instance currently we recv a deluge of emails from the Registry. There
is no standardization as to where these emails are sent. Currently for
instance more than one registry sends the transfer notifications and the low
balance notifications to the same email address, as a result of which my
accounts team has to swim through hundreds of emails to find a low balance
notification mail.
Currently I feel the buckets should be as follows -
* Transfer notification mails
* Low Balance Notifications
* Maintenance updates
Each registrar should be able to specify separate email addresses for
receving the above.
If any of you have any other buckets or further classification/comments to
make please send them to the list and to Ray (copied on this email), so he
may compile our feedback and take it ahead
Best Regards
Bhavin Turakhia
Founder, Chairman & CEO
Directi
-------------------------
http://www.directi.com
http://www.logicboxes.com
Tel: +91-22-56797600
Fax: +91-22-56797510
Board (US): +1 (415) 240 4171 ext 7600
Fax (US): +1 (320) 210 5146
-------------------------
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.708 / Virus Database: 464 - Release Date: 18/06/2004
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.708 / Virus Database: 464 - Release Date: 18/06/2004
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|