<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Registry Communication standardization
- To: Bhavin Turakhia <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Registry Communication standardization
- From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:42:52 -0700
- Cc: "'Ray Fassett'" <rfassett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<div>Bhavin/Ray,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>A separate email address for Transfer dispute issues would also be
helpful. I think Registries are currently using the existing list
Tina put together for this anyway.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I would also suggest another *general* business bucket for emails
that do not fit into one of the other buckets, but are notices to all
registrars, or a group of registrars. For example, promotion notices,
web conferences, etc.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><STRONG>Other thoughts:</STRONG></div>
<div>Basically, I would prefer that the Registries never email
any of the business, admin, tech, or billing contacts that we provide
to them when being accredited with their registry EXCEPT when it is a
one-to-one type issue that needs a more immediate notice and/or
resolution. So the logic might look something like:</div>
<UL>
<LI>To multiple registrars - Use the buckets</LI>
<LI>To a single registrar regarding a bucket related issue -
Use the bucket and the appropriate Registrar Contacts</LI>
<LI>To a single registrar regarding a non-bucket issue - Use the
appropriate Registrar Contacts<BR></LI></UL>
<div><BR></div>
<P style="MARGIN: 0px">Tim Ruiz<BR>VP, Domain Services<BR>The Go Daddy
Group, Inc.<BR>Office: 319-294-3940<BR>Fax: 480-247-4516<BR><A
href="mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx">tim@xxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR></P><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT:
blue 2px solid"><BR>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject:
[registrars] Registry Communication standardization<BR>From: "Bhavin
Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Date: Tue, September 27, 2005
12:35 pm<BR>To: "'Registrars Constituency'"
<registrars@xxxxxxxx><BR>Cc: "'Ray Fassett'"
<rfassett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR><BR>Hi all,<BR><BR>Based on our
joint meeting in Luxembourg, Registries are starting to work on<BR>some
of the concern areas that we highlighted to them in our meeting.
Ray<BR>Fassett is steering the liaison with our group. The first task
at hand is<BR>standardization of the classification of auto generated
communication from<BR>Registries.<BR><BR>What we need to provide Ray is
a possible set of classifications of auto<BR>generated emails from the
Registry.<BR><BR>For instance currently we recv a deluge of emails from
the Registry. There<BR>is no standardization as to where these emails
are sent. Currently for<BR>instance more than one registry sends the
transfer notifications and the low<BR>balance notifications to the same
email address, as a result of which my<BR>accounts team has to swim
through hundreds of emails to find a low balance<BR>notification
mail.<BR><BR>Currently I feel the buckets should be as follows
-<BR><BR>* Transfer notification mails<BR>* Low Balance
Notifications<BR>* Maintenance updates<BR><BR>Each registrar should be
able to specify separate email addresses for<BR>receving the
above.<BR><BR>If any of you have any other buckets or further
classification/comments to<BR>make please send them to the list and to
Ray (copied on this email), so he<BR>may compile our feedback and take
it ahead<BR><BR>Best Regards<BR>Bhavin Turakhia<BR>Founder, Chairman
&
CEO<BR>Directi<BR>-------------------------<BR>http://www.directi.com<BR>http://www.logicboxes.com<BR>Tel:
+91-22-56797600<BR>Fax: +91-22-56797510<BR>Board (US): +1 (415) 240 4171
ext 7600<BR>Fax (US): +1 (320) 210 5146<BR>-------------------------
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|