Re: [registrars] Registry Communication standardization

["Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

not sure if that fits, but I would like to reiterate the idea that all
registrars are represented by their IANA-ID in transfer notifications that
the registries send, so that the registrars do not have to maintain lists for
each registry seperately.

Yours,
Marcus



> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Based on our joint meeting in Luxembourg, Registries are starting to work on
> some of the concern areas that we highlighted to them in our meeting. Ray
> Fassett is steering the liaison with our group. The first task at hand is
> standardization of the classification of auto generated communication from
> Registries.
> 
> What we need to provide Ray is a possible set of classifications of auto
> generated emails from the Registry.
> 
> For instance currently we recv a deluge of emails from the Registry. There
> is no standardization as to where these emails are sent. Currently for
> instance more than one registry sends the transfer notifications and the low
> balance notifications to the same email address, as a result of which my
> accounts team has to swim through hundreds of emails to find a low balance
> notification mail.
> 
> Currently I feel the buckets should be as follows -
> 
> * Transfer notification mails
> * Low Balance Notifications
> * Maintenance updates
> 
> Each registrar should be able to specify separate email addresses for
> receving the above.
> 
> If any of you have any other buckets or further classification/comments to
> make please send them to the list and to Ray (copied on this email), so he
> may compile our feedback and take it ahead
> 
> Best Regards
> Bhavin Turakhia
> Founder, Chairman & CEO
> Directi
> -------------------------
> http://www.directi.com
> http://www.logicboxes.com
> Tel: +91-22-56797600
> Fax: +91-22-56797510
> Board (US): +1 (415) 240 4171 ext 7600
> Fax (US): +1 (320) 210 5146
> ------------------------- 
>