<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Representative for the Presidents Advisory Committee for IDN
- To: "'Thomas Barrett - EnCirca'" <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Representative for the Presidents Advisory Committee for IDN
- From: "John Berryhill" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:46:28 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20050928135348.7F1901F9@dm17.mta.everyone.net>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcXEUxvwzHtDVuMKQcaPi15UrAI0cgAAhlCAAAZXgJAABd2QgA==
Has anyone checked the assignment records of these, and many other, goodies
lately:
US Pat. No. 6,829,653 Method and system for internationalizing domain names
US Pat. No. 6,446,133 Multi-language domain name service
US Pat. No. 6,314,469 Multi-language domain name service
US Pat. No. 6,182,148 Method and system for internationalizing domain names
These are just a few examples.
ICANN is interesting in not having an intellectual property disclosure
policy (much less a licensing policy for contributing entities).
Given attempts by some to patent such things as proxy whois service (with a
filing date long post-dating known proxy whois services), it might be
worthwhile to have some disclosure of interest relative to IP relevant to
subject matter under consideration as a standard practice.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|