ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Regarding rules of procedure

  • To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Regarding rules of procedure
  • From: "John Berryhill" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:07:25 -0400
  • Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <20050708113227.10461.qmail@webmail02.mesa1.secureserver.net>
  • Reply-to: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



>I agree with the quorum idea. Perhaps the quorum is based on names 
>under management. All votes will still be considered equal, one for 
>one. But a certain percentage of names needs to represented in the 
>vote to establish a quorum.

... including names within the add/grace period at the time of the vote.








<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>