<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Regarding rules of procedure
- To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Regarding rules of procedure
- From: "John Berryhill" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:07:25 -0400
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <20050708113227.10461.qmail@webmail02.mesa1.secureserver.net>
- Reply-to: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I agree with the quorum idea. Perhaps the quorum is based on names
>under management. All votes will still be considered equal, one for
>one. But a certain percentage of names needs to represented in the
>vote to establish a quorum.
... including names within the add/grace period at the time of the vote.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|