ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Regarding rules of procedure

  • To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] Regarding rules of procedure
  • From: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 08:21:06 -0400
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcWDtup21OzXN1+lQ1OCs+nTQDHq5AAAKlkP
  • Thread-topic: [registrars] Regarding rules of procedure

I agree as well. Also, a quorum provision for voting already is included in the draft rules.  Thanks. Jon 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robert F. Connelly [mailto:BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:	Fri Jul 08 08:16:48 2005
To:	Registrars Constituency
Subject:	Re: [registrars] Regarding rules of procedure

At 04:17 AM 7/8/05, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suggest to decrease the number of endorsements necessary
> > from 5 to 3.
> > This is to encourage more activity in the RC as I think we
> > have not seen enough things moving in the past.

Dear Marcus and Bruce:

I would certainly confer with other Task Force members, but I am minded to 
accept the reduction to three endorsers as a "friendly amendment".

Regards, BobC




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>