<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Regarding rules of procedure
- To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Regarding rules of procedure
- From: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 08:21:06 -0400
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcWDtup21OzXN1+lQ1OCs+nTQDHq5AAAKlkP
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Regarding rules of procedure
I agree as well. Also, a quorum provision for voting already is included in the draft rules. Thanks. Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert F. Connelly [mailto:BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Fri Jul 08 08:16:48 2005
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: Re: [registrars] Regarding rules of procedure
At 04:17 AM 7/8/05, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suggest to decrease the number of endorsements necessary
> > from 5 to 3.
> > This is to encourage more activity in the RC as I think we
> > have not seen enough things moving in the past.
Dear Marcus and Bruce:
I would certainly confer with other Task Force members, but I am minded to
accept the reduction to three endorsers as a "friendly amendment".
Regards, BobC
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|