ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Amendment to Rules of Procedure, three more hands to endorse them.

  • To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Amendment to Rules of Procedure, three more hands to endorse them.
  • From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 08:17:53 -0700
  • Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<div>Bob,</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>I don't know about everyone else, but with everything that's been
going on I just have not had time to really read this. I would
appreciate more time, or perhaps convering it in more detail in the RC
meeting in LUX.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Tim<BR><BR></div>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT:
blue 2px solid"><BR>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject:
[registrars] Amendment to Rules of Procedure, three more hands<BR>to
endorse &nbsp;them.<BR>From: "Robert F. Connelly"
&lt;BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Fri, July 08, 2005 7:53 am<BR>To:
"Registrars Constituency" &lt;registrars@xxxxxxxx&gt;<BR><BR>Dear
Members:<BR><BR>Let me bring you up to date on this issue. &nbsp;I made
the motion on 13 May 2005.<BR><BR>There was one endorsement -- and a lot
of discussion. &nbsp;Jon raised some <BR>questions, as did Ross.
&nbsp;Jon, Ross and I met by telephone and found a
<BR>consensus.<BR><BR>What we need now are five members who will
endorse the present amended <BR>motion. &nbsp;I believe I may depend
upon Jon and Ross.<BR><BR>Do I see other hands? &nbsp;I'd sure like to
see this issue wrapped up prior to <BR>our next
vote;-)<BR><BR>Cordially, BobC </BLOCKQUOTE>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>