ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] DOC will not cede control over ICANN??

  • To: Bhavin Turakhia <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] DOC will not cede control over ICANN??
  • From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 10:09:07 -0400
  • Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <200507040924.j649O5gC024650@pechora.icann.org>
  • Organization: Tucows Inc.
  • References: <200507040924.j649O5gC024650@pechora.icann.org>
  • Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/07/2005 5:29 AM Bhavin Turakhia noted that;

> Does anyone have the link to the actual declaration made by the DOC?

http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/USDNSprinciples_06302005.htm

As Milton points out, this is very different than what we originally
bargained for.

- --






                      -rwr



Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My weblog: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)

iD8DBQFCyUMD6sL06XjirooRAuc7AJwOc1/UW/AzgQ+btzeJAP+/xLw8MwCcCi7C
bQaz1nYu1dhLmHtFBfcnWgw=
=4dL/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>