<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] DOC will not cede control over ICANN??
- To: Bhavin Turakhia <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] DOC will not cede control over ICANN??
- From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 10:09:07 -0400
- Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <200507040924.j649O5gC024650@pechora.icann.org>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <200507040924.j649O5gC024650@pechora.icann.org>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/2005 5:29 AM Bhavin Turakhia noted that;
> Does anyone have the link to the actual declaration made by the DOC?
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/USDNSprinciples_06302005.htm
As Milton points out, this is very different than what we originally
bargained for.
- --
-rwr
Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My weblog: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQFCyUMD6sL06XjirooRAuc7AJwOc1/UW/AzgQ+btzeJAP+/xLw8MwCcCi7C
bQaz1nYu1dhLmHtFBfcnWgw=
=4dL/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|