<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Amendment to Rules of Procedure.
- To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Amendment to Rules of Procedure.
- From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 09:51:39 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <6.2.1.2.2.20050513073731.0380a6a0@pop3.loadmail.com> from "Robert F. Connelly" at "May 13, 2005 07:45:52 am"
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CORE endorses to vote on this motion.
Yours,
Marcus
> Dear Members:
>
> The attached files are a proposed amendment to the Rules of Procedure, part
> II. They are provided in both .doc and .rtf format.
>
> The original Rules on election of officers, delegates, etc. are confusing
> as they used the wording from Part I, which relates to Motions.
>
> Changes to the Rules of Procedure require only a simple majority to be
> accepted.
>
> This proposal has been vetted before the By-Laws Task Force. However, it
> requires endorsement by five members.
>
> I therefore move that this amendment be accepted. I seek your endorsements.
>
> Respectfully submitted,
> Bob Connelly
> Secretary
> Registrars Constituency
>
>
[Attachment, skipping...]
[Attachment, skipping...]
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|