<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Amendment to Rules of Procedure.
- To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Amendment to Rules of Procedure.
- From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:08:49 -0400
- Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <6.2.1.2.2.20050513073731.0380a6a0@pop3.loadmail.com>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050513073731.0380a6a0@pop3.loadmail.com>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 13/05/2005 10:45 AM Robert F. Connelly noted that;
> This proposal has been vetted before the By-Laws Task Force. However,
> it requires endorsement by five members.
I don't believe this statement is accurate. In fact, the by-laws task
force has been dormant for months, and this document does not have its
endorsement. This motion is highly irregular.
Regards,
- --
-rwr
Tucows Start Service: http://start.tucows.com
My contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
My weblog: http://www.byte.org/
"You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus."
- Mark Twain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQFChMMB6sL06XjirooRAj2nAJoCvwTGVO3+Bi5IO4Hqse6RXFcNAwCeKtuT
sVJf1BY22msDdDtsuYWgvfM=
=OZnu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|