ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] FW: ICANN Strategic Plan Feedback

  • To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: ICANN Strategic Plan Feedback
  • From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:43:54 +0530
  • Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <41EE642B.6020307@tucows.com>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcT+LfuFhFnFBUZSRS6l/9JaRFh08gAAqqig

> It is my understanding that staff is looking for detailed 
> feedback on specific points rather than a registrar position 
> per se. Also note that this is happening in parallel with the 

I understand that. I am sorry for the miscommunication. I did not mean for
us to come up with a "Yes we accept this plan" or "No we do not accept this
plan" :)

It is my intention that we should as a group offer specific feedback

> The efforts at these two levels should be synchronized.

Infavt other constituencies are working on this too, however before we go
ahead and involve everyone it maybe prudent to first figure out what we want

> I am in the process of conducting an analysis in preparation 
> for the Amsterdam meeting. I understand that Bruce Tonkin is 
> doing the same.
> It would be useful to include Bruce and I in the constituency 
> level activity and feed the input from individual members 
> into the Council effort which is intended to be reflective of 
> Constituency input.

That's great. What I think would be best is as follows -

* You, Bruce and Jon Nevetta and anyone else can together come up with your
analysis of the document. This analysis maybe input for the GNSO council,
maybe provided to the ICANN staff and can also be circulated amongst all us
Registrars. Post that we will send out a communication with a set of
feedback to ICANN based on the combiend analysis and the feedback provided
by all the Registrars


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>