<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
- To: "Ross Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
- From: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:52:43 -0500
- Cc: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcT0Bxh3lu0Ky1SdQruP6vpZj8Yp8QAAGVqg
- Thread-topic: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
Ross: Thanks for the clarification. I am referring to our response to
the IPC's proposal made at the TF3. Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 10:47 AM
To: Nevett, Jonathon
Cc: Tim Ruiz; registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois
tf 1/2 recommendations
Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
> Shouldn't we respond in a similar fashion to our response to the Task
> Force 3 proposals?
There is no TF3 proposal at this point. I'll be sure to keep everyone up
to date on progress on that front, but so far, nothing has happened
since KL (excepting that our chair has resigned and an interim meeting
has been tenatively scheduled for this month to followup on KL
discussions).
--
-rwr
Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My weblog: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|