<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
- To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:51:42 -0500
- Cc: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <41DD5D8A.6020008@tucows.com>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <9A9B4ED8FC9E334AA0B654078CFDAA6FA1808E@VAMAIL3.CORPIT.NSI.NET> <41DD5D8A.6020008@tucows.com>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
Shouldn't we respond in a similar fashion to our response to the Task
Force 3 proposals?
There is no TF3 proposal at this point. I'll be sure to keep everyone up
to date on progress on that front, but so far, nothing has happened
since KL (excepting that our chair has resigned and an interim meeting
has been tenatively scheduled for this month to followup on KL
discussions).
Capetown, I meant Capetown.
--
-rwr
Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My weblog: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|