Re: [registrars] Proliferation of registrar locks

["Paul Lecoultre(CORE secretariat)" <secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> So lets start a laundry list:
>
> 1. Does the policy appropriately deal with registrar_lock proliferation
> and implementation? How can the policy be amended/modified/improved to
> take into account the evolution of practices in the market over the last
> 12 months?
2. A fixed URL for lock and authinfo by registrars that will be sent to
   ICANN/registries that would be available for registrars to query or remove the protection/
   request the authinfos via the FOA at the loosing registrar. With this solution the protection
   can be removed easily and the authinfos can be requested and sent to the admin of the domain.

hope more will come...

Paul






> Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
> Skydasher: A great way to start your day
> My weblog: http://www.byte.org
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
>
> iD8DBQFBmMH56sL06XjirooRAlMzAJ99JlFD8rw37ZEs9ArqFqHF6mi7EACcClnk
> mgQAqqMcCIh0/35Lb1br82Y=
> =QjY1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
CORE Internet Council of Registrars   http://corenic.org
WTC II, 29 route de Pre-Bois, CH-1215 Geneva, Switzerland
Tel +4122 929-5744 Fax +4122 929-5745 secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxx