<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Proliferation of registrar locks
- To: "Paul Lecoultre(CORE secretariat)" <secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Proliferation of registrar locks
- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:06:22 -0500
- Cc: Registrars@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4194F648.4070708@corenic.org>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <4194F648.4070708@corenic.org>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2004 12:43 PM Paul Lecoultre(CORE secretariat) noted that;
| I see a major issue on this behaviour as neither the transfer policy nore
| the dispute resolution policy consider this clearly.
The transfer policy is very clear on the status of lock. I'm not sure
that I see what you are getting at - or at least I'm not seeing the same
thing you are - help me understand. :)
- --
~ -rwr
Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My weblog: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQFBlPue6sL06XjirooRAsB2AJ9NGha1MtqGxevu+y1V+KbZe1udxwCfVPKw
/sh0AbI9p6uXGtnPNnsVerM=
=m6jL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|