<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
- To: "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Marcus Faure'" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
- From: "Monte Cahn" <monte@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 08:25:36 -0400
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20040810120030.29591.qmail@webmail04.mesa1.secureserver.net>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcR+0wrxGWqwgalzSx2jitTMqR10QAAAbSJw
we would support it as well
Monte Cahn
Founder/CEO
Monte@xxxxxxxxxxx
Monte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
O - 954-984-8445
F - 954-969-9155
www.Moniker.com - ICANN Accredited Corporate <http://www.moniker.com/>
Domain Management Services
www.DomainSystems.com - Domain Sales <http://www.domainsystems.com/> &
After-market Services
www.CoolHandle.com - World Class Hosting and <http://www.coolhandle.com/>
Email Solutions
_____
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 8:01 AM
To: Marcus Faure
Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
Standardized ids for registrars is an excellent idea. We would support it.
Tim, Go Daddy
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, August 10, 2004 1:39 am
To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Hi all,
I propose that the registries implement the following change:
Instead of using proprietory registrar ids, standardized ids shall be used
both on protocol level (rrp/epp/reports etc.) and in the whois output.
The effect would be that for example CORE is IANA-15 in all registry
communication and not R135-LRMS at Afilias, R23-LROR at PIR and so on.
Especially transfers would become simpler, e.g. registrants will be less
confused who they want to transfer their domain to,
Yours,
Marcus
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|