ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Using IANA IDs

  • To: Marcus Faure <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
  • From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 05:00:30 -0700
  • Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<div>Standardized ids for registrars is an excellent idea. We would
support it.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Tim, Go Daddy<BR><BR></div>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT:
blue 2px solid"><BR>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject:
[registrars] Using IANA IDs<BR>From: "Marcus Faure"
&lt;faure@xxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Tue, August 10, 2004 1:39 am<BR>To:
registrars@xxxxxxxx<BR><BR>Hi all,<BR><BR>I propose that the registries
implement the following change:<BR><BR>Instead of using proprietory
registrar ids, standardized ids shall be used<BR>both on protocol level
(rrp/epp/reports etc.) and in the whois output.<BR><BR>The effect would
be that for example CORE is IANA-15 in all registry<BR>communication
and not R135-LRMS at Afilias, R23-LROR at PIR and so on.<BR>Especially
transfers would become simpler, e.g. registrants will be less
<BR>confused who they want to transfer their domain
to,<BR><BR>Yours,<BR>Marcus </BLOCKQUOTE>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>