<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
- To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
- From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:10:45 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: Rob Hall <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jay Westerdal <jwesterdal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <200408102306.i7AN6tcN009354@nic-naa.net> from Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine at "Aug 10, 2004 11:06:55 pm"
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
maybe we should use an id like IANA-nn for (de-)accredited registrars and
a prefix LOCAL-<registry>-nn for non-IANA registrars.
I do not think that the LOCAL tags should be much of a problem as they will
not appear frequently in everyday life. The whole purpose of this approach
is simplification for the end user, and that is reached when you have a
solution for 99% of all cases.
Yours,
Marcus
> Rob,
>
> I agree that it seems that the IANA allocations are one-time, however,
> there are non-allocations that show up in registries (see Jay's note),
> and when an IANA code point is "de-allocated", how is the name of the
> defunct (or at least not currently "in status", dues, policy or whatnot)
> recovered?
>
> Who were registrars #4-7, what is #8, who was #10-12, 17-30, et seq.?
>
> Eric
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|