<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
- To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
- From: Paul Stahura <stahura@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 08:43:07 -0700
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
eNom Agrees
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Keller
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 2:10 AM
To: Marcus Faure
Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
Schlund is definitely in SUPPORT of such a change. I hope that
the migration to EPP 1.0 will provide us with the possibility
to implement such a change.
Best,
tom
Am 10.08.2004 schrieb Marcus Faure:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I propose that the registries implement the following change:
>
> Instead of using proprietory registrar ids, standardized ids shall be used
> both on protocol level (rrp/epp/reports etc.) and in the whois output.
>
> The effect would be that for example CORE is IANA-15 in all registry
> communication and not R135-LRMS at Afilias, R23-LROR at PIR and so on.
> Especially transfers would become simpler, e.g. registrants will be less
> confused who they want to transfer their domain to,
>
> Yours,
> Marcus
>
>
>
Gruss,
tom
(__)
(OO)_____
(oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of
| |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!
w w w w
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|