RE: [registrars] PIR EPP 1.0 and Domain Info command

["Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agreed.

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine 
> [mailto:brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, 9 August 2004 9:10 PM
> To: Bruce Tonkin
> Cc: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine; 
> registrars@xxxxxxxx; brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [registrars] PIR EPP 1.0 and Domain Info command 
> 
> Morning and Afternoon Bruce,
> 
> > that making changes
> > without appropriate notice and discussion is a bad thing.   
> PIR should
> > have raised this topic for discussion during the meeting in 
> KL, and at 
> > least scheduled a teleconference.
> 
> Each hiccup is a gift to the competing .net bidders.
> 
> IMHO, provisioning, and the parties who provision, isn't 
> usefully identified with publication. Provisioning isn't 
> "whois", any more than escrow.
> 
> If it is, then the role of registrars (and registries) in 
> making policy is going to be much, much less then the IPC's 
> role. Let that camel into the tent and they may get very creative ... 
> 
> Eric
>