<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] PIR EPP 1.0 and Domain Info command
- To: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] PIR EPP 1.0 and Domain Info command
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 11:09:39 +0000
- Cc: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx, brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Aug 2004 17:04:51 +1000." <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB540595E8@balius.mit>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Morning and Afternoon Bruce,
> that making changes
> without appropriate notice and discussion is a bad thing. PIR should
> have raised this topic for discussion during the meeting in KL, and at
> least scheduled a teleconference.
Each hiccup is a gift to the competing .net bidders.
IMHO, provisioning, and the parties who provision, isn't usefully
identified with publication. Provisioning isn't "whois", any more
than escrow.
If it is, then the role of registrars (and registries) in making
policy is going to be much, much less then the IPC's role. Let
that camel into the tent and they may get very creative ...
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|