<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] .net thick/thin discussion
- To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] .net thick/thin discussion
- From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:58:27 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB541587D5@balius.mit> from Bruce Tonkin at "Jul 22, 2004 07:46:59 pm"
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
I personally think that this will cause a lot of confusion and support for the
registrars. One of the reasons I support thick is that we have so many
broken whois servers out there. A thin approach will not cure this.
Yours,
Marcus
> Thanks Marcus.
>
> I agree that the registrars constituency does not seem to have a
> consensus position on this topic.
>
> My view is that a registry operator can technically operate a thick and
> thin model in parallel, and the choice should be made available to
> registrars according to their business model and technical resources.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marcus Faure
> > Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 5:07 PM
> > To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [registrars] .net thick/thin discussion
> >
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > following a discussion among german-speaking registrars, I
> > would like to state that the rc should reconsider its
> > position on the "thinness" of .net.
> > I understand that at least some people in the rc are in
> > favour of a thin model, however, our little group has
> > unanimously decided to favour a thick model. Therefore, the
> > rc recommendation should not favour thick or thin as at least
> > at this point in time there is no clear vote for either direction.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Marcus
> >
> > on behalf of core, key systems, psi-usa and schlund
> >
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|