Re: [registrars] .net thick/thin discussion

[Jean-Michel Becar <jmbecar@xxxxxx>]

I agree with Marcus.
I like thick registries, whois is easier to manage and having most of 
the TLD (.biz, .info, .name, .org)  being thick today, I wish  I could 
have all my system  as much consistent  as  possible.
Less code to maintain = less cost.
JM

Marcus Faure wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I personally think that this will cause a lot of confusion and support for the
> registrars. One of the reasons I support thick is that we have so many
> broken whois servers out there. A thin approach will not cure this.
>
> Yours,
> Marcus
>
>  
>
> > Thanks Marcus.
> >
> > I agree that the registrars constituency does not seem to have a
> > consensus position on this topic.
> >
> > My view is that a registry operator can technically operate a thick and
> > thin model in parallel, and the choice should be made available to
> > registrars according to their business model and technical resources.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> >    
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marcus Faure
> > > Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 5:07 PM
> > > To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [registrars] .net thick/thin discussion
> > >
> > >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > following a discussion among german-speaking registrars, I 
> > > would like to state that the rc should reconsider its 
> > > position on the "thinness" of .net.
> > > I understand that at least some people in the rc are in 
> > > favour of a thin model, however, our little group has 
> > > unanimously decided to favour a thick model. Therefore, the 
> > > rc recommendation should not favour thick or thin as at least 
> > > at this point in time there is no clear vote for either direction.
> > > Yours,
> > > Marcus
> > >
> > > on behalf of core, key systems, psi-usa and schlund
> > >
> > >      
>