<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] .net thick/thin discussion
- To: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] .net thick/thin discussion
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:46:59 +1000
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcRvy/E44kwwV+UaQjCGBpE1XwynzwABKPKA
- Thread-topic: [registrars] .net thick/thin discussion
Thanks Marcus.
I agree that the registrars constituency does not seem to have a
consensus position on this topic.
My view is that a registry operator can technically operate a thick and
thin model in parallel, and the choice should be made available to
registrars according to their business model and technical resources.
Regards,
Bruce
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marcus Faure
> Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 5:07 PM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] .net thick/thin discussion
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> following a discussion among german-speaking registrars, I
> would like to state that the rc should reconsider its
> position on the "thinness" of .net.
> I understand that at least some people in the rc are in
> favour of a thin model, however, our little group has
> unanimously decided to favour a thick model. Therefore, the
> rc recommendation should not favour thick or thin as at least
> at this point in time there is no clear vote for either direction.
>
> Yours,
> Marcus
>
> on behalf of core, key systems, psi-usa and schlund
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|