Re: [registrars] FW: Transfer Undo Mechanism

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 6/9/2004 6:57 PM Elana Broitman noted that:

> Dear all - one of the last remaining issues before ICANN can publish the
> changed transfers policy is how the registries will address the transfer
> undo mechanism. 
This is what we have been waiting for since the end of March?

I can't understand why everything takes so long to implement once the 
decisions have been made. Imagine if we each ran our respective 
businesses with similar urgency.
Transfer undo is a critical element of the policy. The registry approach 
warrants further examination, but I completely disagree with your 
accompanying analysis. In any event, none of this really matters because 
this officially brings us to the fourth (fifth, sixth?) round of 
transfer policy debates and frankly, I'm just not interested in 
participating.
The policy was designed to be implemented and then revisited on a 
"debug" basis on regular intervals. I would urge ICANN to do precisely this.
I can't for the life of me understand what is so difficult about this 
set of policy recommendations that makes it impossible for ICANN to 
implement it.
--
Regards,


	-rwr






"In the modern world the intelligence of public opinion is the one 
indispensable condition for social progress."
	- Charles W. Eliot (1834 - 1926)