<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] Re: India, United Kingdom, USA
- To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [registrars] Re: India, United Kingdom, USA
- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:01:39 -0800
- In-reply-to: <VIRGILd9Ee4zadTMVwV00022137@mail.gbp.co.uk>
- References: <VIRGILd9Ee4zadTMVwV00022137@mail.gbp.co.uk>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<html>
<body>
At 04:41 AM 3/1/04, World Trademark Law Report wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><div align="center"><b><a href="http://www.worldtrademarklawreport.com/index.cfm?action=login&c=1046621&id=995";>Motion
to dismiss, transfer or stay cybersquatting action refused</a></b>
<b>USA</b> <br>
The US District Court for the District of Delaware has denied Orthotec
LLC's motion to dismiss, transfer or stay the proceedings in a
cybersquatting dispute involving the domain name 'argos-us.com'. The
court based its decision, among other things, on the fact that the
plaintiff, Argos, had used its mark ARGOS in commerce by operating a
website at 'argos-europe.com'.
<a href="http://www.worldtrademarklawreport.com/index.cfm?action=login&c=1046621&id=995";>Full
text</a> </div>
</blockquote></body>
</html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|