ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Straw Poll

  • To: Elana Broitman <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Straw Poll
  • From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:04:56 -0700
  • Cc: halloran@xxxxxxxxx, registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Elana, Bob,<br>
&nbsp;<br>
Go Daddy endorses such a motion.<br>
&nbsp;<br>
Tim Ruiz<br>
VP Domain Services<br>
The Go Daddy Group, Inc.<br>
Go Daddy Software, Inc.<BR><BR><br>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><BR>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: [registrars] Straw Poll<BR>From: "Elana Broitman" &lt;ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Tue, March 02, 2004 9:03 am<BR>To: registrars@xxxxxxxx<BR>Cc: halloran@xxxxxxxxx<BR><BR>All, please note below a statement introduced at the constituency meeting. &nbsp;The constituency members at the meeting requested that we report to the Board the following sentiment. &nbsp;This sentiment garnered the following straw vote: 19 in support, 3 in oppostion and 6 abstentions:<BR><BR>On March 2, the Registrars Constituency, after taking into account the January 26th letter from ICANN to VeriSign regarding negotiations between ICANN and VeriSign, and taking into consideration the evolution of ICANN policy regarding deletions, hereby opposes the proposed Wait Listing Service and urges ICANN Board of Directors to vote against the currently proposed Wait Listi!
ng Service.<BR><BR><BR>This statement may also be moved for a formal vote if the motion and five endorsements are made by emails to the Constituency Secretary by email. </BLOCKQUOTE>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>