<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] FOISA
- To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Cute, Brian A." <bcute@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] FOISA
- From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:09:19 -0500
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcPs5UAUtHruiWx+TsC3ky87BGUFxAAB6dvw
- Thread-topic: [registrars] FOISA
all - I believe that the real threat connected with this bill is not the bill itself, but how it will be used to push other bills or policies that impose new unfunded requirements on us. So, we need to look at this issue broadly.
If people are interested, Brian and I can brief in Rome on the state of US laws and regs on privacy/accuracy issues.
Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax (212) 629-9309
ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of ross@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 2:03 PM
To: Cute, Brian A.
Cc: 'registrars@xxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [registrars] FOISA
On 2/6/2004 12:58 PM Cute, Brian A. noted that:
> I also would take issue with many of the aspects of the points made in the
> testimony.
> <<smittx_057_xml.PDF>>
> Let me know if you have any questions.
I would be interested in hearing more from the constituency regarding
the merits of this bill and this hearing. Gaining an understanding the
full range of points on this tricky continuum will be useful from both
a Whois-TF and Names Council perspective.
Would you be in any sort of position to present an analysis of the
bill and its merits at the Rome meeting? It would be a great way to
foster a constituency dialog on the specifics of this particular subject.
--
-rwr
"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
All life is an experiment.
The more experiments you make the better."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|