ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] FOISA

  • To: "'ross@xxxxxxxxxx'" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Cute, Brian A." <bcute@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] FOISA
  • From: "Cute, Brian A." <bcute@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:07:04 -0500
  • Cc: "'registrars@xxxxxxxx'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I think that would be a very useful thing to do if others agree.

Brian 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 2:03 PM
To: Cute, Brian A.
Cc: 'registrars@xxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [registrars] FOISA


On 2/6/2004 12:58 PM Cute, Brian A. noted that:

> I also would take issue with many of the aspects of the points made in the
> testimony.

>    <<smittx_057_xml.PDF>> 
> Let me know if you have any questions.

I would be interested in hearing more from the constituency regarding 
the merits of this bill and this hearing. Gaining an understanding the 
full range of points on this tricky continuum will be useful from both 
a Whois-TF and Names Council perspective.

Would you be in any sort of position to present an analysis of the 
bill and its merits at the Rome meeting? It would be a great way to 
foster a constituency dialog on the specifics of this particular subject.
-- 


                        -rwr








                 "Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
                                            All life is an experiment.
                             The more experiments you make the better."
						- Ralph Waldo Emerson

Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>