<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] FW: invitations to Monday's event on wildcards/finalizing
- To: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: invitations to Monday's event on wildcards/finalizing
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:42:05 +1000
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcOVorfoHXEtgObnQ1ykNHyWtC2pNwABK7bQAASf6PEASLIpkA==
- Thread-topic: [registrars] FW: invitations to Monday's event on wildcards/finalizing
Hello Elana,
I do not want to participate in the panel, bu I will attend the event.
One question for the panel to consider.
If wildcard records are allowed in a gtld, why should the registry have
a pre-emptive right to register them on their own behalf?
In .au when we changed the policy allowing records that were previously
unavailable, a process was chosen to allocate those domains (the process
chosen was auction but there are other methods) on a fair and equal
basis.
Also (partly tongue-in-cheek) - are the wildcard records *.com and *.net
now in the Redemption Grace Period? When will they be available for
re-registration? I assume if Verisign does not reclaim them in the next
30 days, they should be available in the delete pool.
Regards,
Bruce
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elana Broitman [mailto:ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, 19 October 2003 7:02 AM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] FW: invitations to Monday's event on
> wildcards/finalizing
>
>
> Anyone coming to Tunisia who is interested in participating
> on a panel that discusses Wildcard service, please let me
> know. This is an opportunity to raise in a public meeting
> the policy, competition, and other issues that registrars
> have faced or are concerned with.
>
> Regards,
>
> Elana Broitman
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|