<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Verisign ownes every name that does not exist - millions for free!
- To: "Jim Archer" <jarcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Verisign ownes every name that does not exist - millions for free!
- From: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:00:38 -0400
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <26267821.1063656623@[192.168.1.155]>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Technical specification are available here:
http://www.verisign.com/nds/naming/sitefinder/index.html
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Archer
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:10 PM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] Verisign ownes every name that does not exist -
> millions for free!
>
>
> Clever Verisign. I suppose you could only do this if you are the
> monopoly
> that controls the root zone, although I have not figured out exactly how
> they do it yet. I'm sure it will be clear as soon as we look into it.
>
> But really, Verisign is essentially using every name that does not exist,
> thereby making it exist, kind of sort of. Can they do this? I
> would have
> thought that even Verisign has to pay for their domain names. With this
> thing in place, they are essentially getting millions of domains for free.
>
> And, since many unsophisticated users often use a web browser to see if a
> domain is available, NSI gets a huge advantage if Verisign
> decides to link
> them to register the domain.
>
> I sure wish that my company could do this. I'll bet everyone here does.
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A996-2003Sep12?language=printer
> http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Internet-Typos.html
>
> *************************
> James W. Archer
> CEO
> http://www.RegistrationTek.com
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|