<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] WIPO-II working group representative
- To: <Registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [registrars] WIPO-II working group representative
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:04:11 +1000
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcN2h20PrqWALzSeSP+oulVZs7H3lQ==
- Thread-topic: WIPO-II working group representative
Hello All,
Elana Broitman, as chair of the registrars constituency, called for
nominations for a registrars representative to the President's working
group on WIPO-II on 19 August 2003.
Elana also nominated Robert Connelly on 19 August 2003.
I seconded this nomination on 19 August 2003.
3 weeks later I have seen no further nominations on the registrars list.
I propose that the registrars constituency appoint Robert Connelly to
this role, without further election.
Are there an objections to this approach?
Note that working group is not a policy formation body, but is mainly
working with the respresenattives from the GAC to provide advice to the
President on whether the WIPO-II issue should proceed through a policy
development process in the GNSO.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|