<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] Location details for WHOIS meeting on Thursday 11 September 2003
- To: <Registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [registrars] Location details for WHOIS meeting on Thursday 11 September 2003
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:44:01 +1000
- Cc: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Ram Mohan" <rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcNns+8pfSnkxQGXTFSUKb1TCuNXiQO0BOmA
- Thread-topic: Location details for WHOIS meeting on Thursday 11 September 2003
Hello All,
The WHOIS workshop will be held in ICANN's offices
- Meeting location: ICANN offices at 4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey,
#330. It is the southern of the two identical high buildings in Marina
del Ray, and is located approximately 15 minutes drive from LAX.
If you haven't already - please advise if you wish to attend.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Tonkin
> Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2003 5:15 PM
> To: Registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: Neuman, Jeff
> Subject: [registrars] WHOIS meeting on Thursday 11 September 2003
>
>
> Hello All,
>
> I would like to hold a meeting on WHOIS to prepare some
> material as input into the GNSO WHOIS Privacy work.
>
> I invite any registrar or registry operator that wishes to attend.
>
> I propose to meet from 10am to 1pm on Thursday 11 September
> in Marina Del Ray.
>
> The agenda will be:
>
> (1) Review current contractual requirements with regard to
> provision of WHOIS services [30 mins]
>
> (2) Review approaches to limit data mining via port 43 and web access
> - suggest short term solution to make a tangible difference
> (prior to any new standard)
> - decide whether solution is consistent with contract of
> whether we require contractual changes [60 mins]
>
> (3) Review the IETF CRISP requirements and see if it meets
> our needs with regard to (1) [30 mins]
>
> (4) Review all registration data that is collected and decide:
> - which data elements should continue to be mandatory (as per current
> contract)
> for those that should be mandatory what is the impact if
> they are not collected
> - which data elements should continue to be displayed via
> WHOIS service [30 mins]
>
> The objective will be to develop a document on the issues
> above for presentation at the registrars meeting on 12
> September 2003, and later circulation via the registrars
> list. The ultimate aim will be to establish a constituency
> position on the above issues via the normal email voting process.
>
> I think that it is important that registrars and registries
> take a lead in moving the issue on WHOIS forward as we did on
> the Transfers issue. If we are not pro-active we risk having
> a solution dictated to us by various Government regulators.
>
> Please let me know if you are interested in attending on Thursday.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> Member of the registrars constituency
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|