<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] DRAFT Standard form for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
- To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [registrars] DRAFT Standard form for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated
- From: Larry Erlich <erlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:32:30 -0400
- Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
- Organization: DomainRegistry.com, Inc.
- References: <09a501c37215$26d8adc0$fa05a8c0@TIMRUIZ> <3F55DEFC.2010006@tucows.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
>
> On 9/3/2003 8:16 AM Tim Ruiz noted that:
>
> > Ross, I have no doubt that would be Tucows' preference.
>
> Its important to our customers that the gaming stop. If gaming wasn't an
> issue, we wouldn't need these overly complex impositions on our
> processes.
If you can, could you elaborate on this a little?
I am not up to speed on the point you are trying to make.
Larry
> This isn't about libertarian pretensions Tim, its about the
> failure of industry to regulate itself in a manner that evenly handles
> consumer rights in addition to its own capital interests.
>
> Its called a long-term view of a healthy industry segment - which I
> believe to be the preference of most people that are serious about this
> business.
>
> --
>
> -rwr
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Erlich - DomainRegistry.com, Inc.
215-244-6700 - FAX:215-244-6605 - Reply: erlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------------
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|