ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: GA Rules Violation Reported

  • To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Re: GA Rules Violation Reported
  • From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:28:30 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=buaIEzSEPmsCAFxbhvN3P9ZwsYhz8Dm0PLTBauP4C6tv1OtQMTVzmFeqPeufr7m/; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3157" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3157" name=GENERATOR>
<P>Danny and all,</P>
<P>&nbsp; I had some other remaining previous days in which I had not posted</P>
<P>the proposed limit of 7, starting 08/23/07 thru 08/30/07.&nbsp; So in accordance</P>
<P>with the proposed rules, I used some of&nbsp;those additional posts remaining&nbsp;yesterday.</P>
<P>Hence, there is no violation of any proposed rule.<BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker <HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Sep 2, 2007 10:52 AM <BR>To: Danny Younger <DANNYYOUNGER@xxxxxxxxx>, GA <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Cc: joe Babtista <BAPTISTA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Secretariat <GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: [ga] Re: GA Rules Violation Reported <BR><BR>
<DIV>Point well taken. If the monitor is so inclined to agree with your request I will start quite simply by asking the Secretariat to act accordingly.&nbsp; To be perfectly honest I have no idea what the proper response will be. The chair notes repetitive over posting without any&nbsp; designation, and or request to do so. It is also noted that many of the posts violate rules in other regards over the past two weeks.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>This is serious and not done lightly.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Eric</DIV>
<DIV>as chair<BR><BR><B><I>Danny Younger &lt;dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx&gt;</I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">jwkckid1 posted to the GA list on eight occasions<BR>within a 24 hour period on September 1 in violation of<BR>the GA rules. I ask that a decision be rendered and<BR>that enforcement of the rules be attempted.<BR><BR>best regards,<BR>Danny<BR><BR><BR><BR>____________________________________________________________________________________<BR>======= <BR><BR>'Regards,<BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing&nbsp; (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of<BR>Information Network Eng.&nbsp; INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>