<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: GA Rules Violation Reported
- To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Re: GA Rules Violation Reported
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 11:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Bvc+jCIVMHtqoh4nX8pIYGJD/q0SfFCgtv8jL4TvdpMtKUJfoDXibXGM48W057OHh0Q5H9vuLb9zugriwTcd3KPKyHf0ncl8jEy08QKfKVIOGhFFB8NkMbgUMrISIStmVdtCO4fEQOASoeq2wOR8NykOlVfA7F0lVfpSMaCQwtY=;
- In-reply-to: <16740335.1188754111108.JavaMail.root@elwamui-rubis.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please specifically cite the Rules section you are relying on in this instance.
Yes you will have to cite the rules specifically and not simply state that you already did that.
Please note that the enlargement of the amount of posts from 5 to 8 has some restrictions and is fully objectively reviewable.
It may also be helpful to let us know what system you used for calculation. If you calculated to assure compliance with the spirit the rules, it may be different than if you used your calculation to get around the rules.
Eric
as Chair
For your convenience;
http://www.geolang.com/draftGAListRules5.htm)
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;} body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;} Danny and all,
I had some other remaining previous days in which I had not posted
the proposed limit of 7, starting 08/23/07 thru 08/30/07. So in accordance
with the proposed rules, I used some of those additional posts remaining yesterday.
Hence, there is no violation of any proposed rule.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hugh Dierker
Sent: Sep 2, 2007 10:52 AM
To: Danny Younger , GA
Cc: joe Babtista , Secretariat
Subject: [ga] Re: GA Rules Violation Reported
Point well taken. If the monitor is so inclined to agree with your request I will start quite simply by asking the Secretariat to act accordingly. To be perfectly honest I have no idea what the proper response will be. The chair notes repetitive over posting without any designation, and or request to do so. It is also noted that many of the posts violate rules in other regards over the past two weeks.
This is serious and not done lightly.
Eric
as chair
Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
jwkckid1 posted to the GA list on eight occasions
within a 24 hour period on September 1 in violation of
the GA rules. I ask that a decision be rendered and
that enforcement of the rules be attempted.
best regards,
Danny
____________________________________________________________________________________
=======
'Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|