<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Posting Rules
- To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Posting Rules
- From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 22:17:43 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=gmmQK9/qxEZ+2R1Od7dFox3A8fmneK3Tape8PICLG13GUVajK2FNHhDqv4tXMWAC; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3157" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>Mr. Dierker and all,</P>
<P> I would agree that we need a set of rules that have the majority of</P>
<P>the GA members support. We don't have that now. I would agree that</P>
<P>we need those whom preach one theing and practice another, such</P>
<P>as yourself, Mr. Dierker to restrain yourself from doing so and/or seek</P>
<P>professional help. I would also agree that moving forward with amendments</P>
<P>which have been put forward by several GA subscribers be voted upon</P>
<P>by a ligitimate voting process, immediately. These amendments were</P>
<P>put forth <STRONG>BEFOR </STRONG>the original helter-skelter voting on list porcess commenced</P>
<P>and were called for by yourself, Mr. Dierker as such.</P>
<P> </P>
<P> I and other GA members have noted that we need no censorship of any</P>
<P>sort which you seem to oppose. As such, presently it may be that because</P>
<P>you Mr. Dierker desire censorship of content of individuals posts for your</P>
<P>own purposes that there is not now, and will unlikely be as long as censorship</P>
<P>is considered as rule, for discourse on any forum, a reluctance for members</P>
<P>to express their opinions, positions, ideas, ect., accordingly. </P>
<P> </P>
<P> You Mr. Dierker do not speak for all the members which has been quite </P>
<P>evident of late yet again. Nor do I or any other member speak for all</P>
<P>of the GA members. Yet you seem to believe that you do. Such a thought</P>
<P>is utter nonsense if you or anyone believes you/they do.<BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker <HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Sep 1, 2007 5:02 PM <BR>To: GA <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: [ga] Posting Rules <BR><BR>
<DIV>After the past month I believe it has become very apparent that in order to have a good working list we need strong rules with real teeth both in writing and in action. </DIV>
<DIV>We have witnessed that being under constant attack the participation level will decrease.</DIV>
<DIV>Which only makes sense. Who wants to have negative things said about them day in and day out. Who wants to have to ferret out truths and untruths before they even get to substantive issues.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>We have watched self policing with the rules adopted but without enforcement abilities. And just as we would suspect they work for the 99.5%. But that .5% can really have a dilitory impact. I assure you that we will move forward with these rules.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Eric</DIV>
<DIV>as Chair</DIV>
<P></P>======= <BR><BR>'Regards,<BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR> Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of<BR>Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|