ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] sTLD Premium Names

  • To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] sTLD Premium Names
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:19:07 -0700
  • Cc: "Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • References: <600131.54511.qm@web52903.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dr. Dierker and all,

  Sarcastic humor intended as follows:

  Maybe they are waiting on selling by back door, sex.travel,
erotica.travel and bootycall.travel < no pun intended >.  I bet
Larry Flint or Playboy would consider bidding.  >:)   Of course
the lawyers would have to disavow any knowledge of such a
transaction as it would be unseemly.  And than maybe they
could pursued Debbie and Dr. Dierker to do the marketing
for them to sell third level domain names.  Of course again as
there is no sex in Vietnam, marketing to that area would
be strictly forbidden.  >:)  As we all likely know, sex travel
junkets are the rage these days...  And sex always sells
well. >:)

  Otherwise I believe their doomed.

Hugh Dierker wrote:

>    Guess their lawyers were not so swift afterall. But wait they have
> yet to close up shop.
>
>   Eric
>
> "Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   Hi Danny,
>
> It would appear that plans for any intended auction for premium
> .travel
> domain names are dead. Given TGLO/Tralliance's critical need for
> operating
> capital, if they had the ability to run an auction to raise money,
> they
> already would have done so. Discussion of their auction plans from 7
> months
> ago are moot at this point.
>
> >From the TheGlobe.com Inc 10-Q filing dated May 11, 2007:
> http://sec.edgar-online.com/2007/05/11/0001144204-07-02443
> /Section8.asp
>
> "BASIS OF PRESENTATION OF CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
>
> We received a report from our independent accountants, relating to our
>
> December 31, 2006 audited financial statements, containing a paragraph
>
> stating that our recurring losses from operations and our accumulated
> deficit raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a
> going
> concern. The Company continues to incur substantial consolidated net
> losses
> and management believes the Company will continue to be unprofitable
> and use
> cash in its operations for the foreseeable future. Based upon our
> current
> cash resources of approximately $480 thousand at May 4, 2007,
> management
> does not believe the Company can operate as a going concern beyond May
>
> 2007."
>
> Sincerely,
> Ted
> Prophet Partners Inc.
> http://www.ProphetPartners.com
> http://www.Premium-Domain-Names.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Danny Younger"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 2:13 PM
> Subject: [ga] sTLD Premium Names
>
>
> > On, Tuesday, 19th December 2006, the Executive
> > Committee of the Board of Directors of The Travel
> > Partnership Corporation approved the following
> > program, subject to a thirty (30) day public comment
> > period and approval by the entire Board:
> >
> > Premium Names
> > Certain premium domain names (e.g., fun.travel and
> > convention.travel) will be reserved by Tralliance and
> > may be sold at a premium price through an auction
> > methodology. Prior to the sale of any premium name,
> > Tralliance will obtain TTPC's approval of the name(s)
> > to be sold.
> >
> > http://www.ttpc.org/announce.htm
> >
> > I have the following questions:
> >
> > 1. Did the entire Travel Partnership Corp. Board
> > finally approve the program? There is no mention of
> > this detail on the website.
> >
> > 2. What names were reserved? Where is the authorized
> > list of reserved names published?
> >
> > 3. What is the auction methodology being used? Where
> > are details of the auction process posted?
> >
> > 4. Why wasn't this proposed program vetted by way of
> > the Registry Services Evaluation Process? -- see
> > http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/
> >
> > 5. Does the current sTLD contract allow for this
> > initiative without the need to invoke the RSEP?
> >
> > 6. At the very least, wouldn't this initiative
> > require an ICANN-authorized modification to the
> > .travel Appendix 6 Schedule of Reserved Names?
> >
> > As premium name initiatives can impact the registrant
> > community, any feedback on the above would be
> > appreciated.
>
>
>
>

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>