ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] GA list and the GNSO council

  • To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] GA list and the GNSO council
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:36:09 -0700
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • References: <919615.23974.qm@web52204.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Danny and all,

  Thank you Danny for the "nc-intake[at]dnso.org:" reference again.
However as you have many times pointed out and/or remarked
these "Black hole" email list addresses have been of little value in
communicating effectively with either the GNSO council or
with the ICANN Bod and staff.  Ergo my request for being
able to post to, NOT ONLY READ, the GNSO council
eMail address, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Danny Younger wrote:

> Hi Avri,
>
> There may be some value in considering the earlier
> adopted NC Intake Procedure:
>
> >From the Rules of Procedure for the DNSO Names
> Council, Version 7
>
> 4.3 Agenda proposals for NC meetings.   Any of the
> following persons can make proposals for NC agenda
> items by e-mail to nc-intake[at]dnso.org:
>
> -- members of the Names Council
> -- the Names Council secretariat
> -- the ICANN Board
> -- members of the ICANN Board
> -- the ICANN officers and staff
> -- the GA Chair
> -- members of the General Assembly (GA) defined as
> subscribers to the ga[at]dnso.org,
> announce[at]dnso.org or the GA voting register
> -- subscribers to an active DNSO ad hoc working group
>
> There will be a limit of one posting per entity per
> day and the IC shall have sole discretion to deal with
> abusive activity. Intake suggestion e-mails for any
> meeting will be publicly archived after the end of the
> meeting in question.
>
> -- Food for thought --
>
> --- Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > While I think it is critical that the GNSO council
> > list be open for
> > reading by all, as well as meeting calls being
> > recorded etc,  as part
> > of our effort to be transparent, I also believe that
> > if the council
> > is get work done, it is critical that the council
> > list remain a
> > council member's list with posting only by council,
> > liaisons and
> > relevant staff.
> >
> > I also beleive that this does not ignore the
> > requirement for
> > openness.  Not only is the GA list open to all, and
> > followed by many
> > in the council, the board and ICANN staff, but there
> > are open
> > consultations that allow for input into the process
> > and there is the
> > recent introduction of open GNSO Working Groups.
> > And while I am sure
> > measures for openness and transparency can be
> > improved, and while I
> > expect the Board's Governance Committee Working
> > Group on GNSO
> > improvement to suggest ways for further openness and
> > transparency in
> > their report, I also believe we must find the proper
> > balance between
> > trying to get work done in a timely manner (still a
> > goal to be sure)
> > and listening/interacting to all voices on the
> > issues.
> >
> > thanks
> > a.
> >
> >
> > On 9 jul 2007, at 03.58, Jeff Williams wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > In that regard,
> > > I would like to ask you kindly as the new GNSO
> > chair if
> > > it would be possible to open up posting by anyone
> > to the
> > > GNSO council's eMail address,
> > council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx?
> > > In the sprit of openness and transparency, this
> > would be
> > > appropriate as well as in abiding by ICANN's
> > bylaws.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your consideration in this request,
> > and again
> > > thank you for chiming in.  >:)
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware protection.
> http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/norton/index.php

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>