Re: [ga] IDNO/ Our online list rules.

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

Fair nuff Jeff,
   
  Barring objection well and timely made; I appoint you head of the Task Force to draw up and present to this august body new rules for the list. I will make the appointment effective at 12 noon PST on July 4th 07 (that should please your patriotic self) 
   
  It is understood that the existing rules will be the template for your endeavor and I hope the IDNO char terr section 9 can guide you in principle.  
   
  In the meantime existing rules shall apply, and you will agree to abide by them until such time as your task force concludes.
   
  I will endeavor to get you a sub list. Now that Mr. Crispin has proclaimed that he manages this list we should have an easy time of it. Then I will endeavor to get your new rules accepted up the ladder and posted. Failing that we will adopt them ourselves and enforce them with vigor.
   
  This is a tough job. But you have shown the energy to usher us into this new phase with aplomb and gusto.
   
  Godspeed
   
  Eric

jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
    body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}        body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}      Dr. Dierker and all,
   
    I believe this should be discussed and debated and than voted
  upon before a viable, broadly excepted, and ethical decision can
  be reached in true democratic fassion.  Anything less is dictatorial
  and thereby illigitimate.
   
    And again it is not a list monitors job to make value judgments,
  regarding whom said what to whom about whatever.  So in the
  tradition of the internet, openess and transparency and in keeping 
  with the right of free speach, and in the best interests of consideration for 
  ALL, not just a few, thank you again Dr. Baptista for your execellent list 
  monitering performance.  Well done thus far!  
   
    As always, thank you for your consideration and necessary cooperation 
  in advance.
  


  -----Original Message----- 
From: Hugh Dierker 
Sent: Jun 30, 2007 8:48 PM 
To: ga 
Subject: [ga] IDNO/ Our online list rules. 

  As I am getting through this IDNO petition and charter I ran into section 9.
   
  I then rummaged around and found nothing that suspends or cancels the existing behavior moderation protocol set forth for the GA.
  I like the IDNOs conceptual model but actually liked the GAs more. It clearly comes down to personalities running the show, as there is no guarantee of free speech on our lists.
  Currently I think Joe is doing just fine. But he is going to have to deal with overzealous overabundant posting. So in the meantime does anyone have an objection to my position that the rules are still in place and we should enforce them as we see fit?
   
  Eric
  
Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827




       
---------------------------------
Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.