ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] IDNO/ Our online list rules.

  • To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] IDNO/ Our online list rules.
  • From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:08:45 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=kM1ZEgOR5utN9CBdqGhgoDr813xF7CKjzRew1PyUaH8QCVkgWP/b89R+L9lfx+HI; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3132" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=compText>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3132" name=GENERATOR>
<P>Dr. Dierker and all,</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; I believe this should be discussed and debated and than voted</P>
<P>upon before a viable, broadly excepted, and ethical decision can</P>
<P>be reached in true democratic fassion.&nbsp; Anything less is dictatorial</P>
<P>and thereby illigitimate.</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; And again it is not a list monitors job to make value judgments,</P>
<P>regarding whom said what to whom about whatever.&nbsp; So in the</P>
<P>tradition of the internet, openess and transparency and&nbsp;in keeping </P>
<P>with the right of free speach, and in the best interests of consideration for </P>
<P>ALL, not just a few, thank you again Dr. Baptista for your execellent list </P>
<P>monitering performance.&nbsp; Well done thus far!&nbsp; </P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; As always, thank you for your consideration and necessary cooperation </P>
<P>in advance.</P>
<DIV id=compText><BR><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker <HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Jun 30, 2007 8:48 PM <BR>To: ga <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: [ga] IDNO/ Our online list rules. <BR><BR>
<DIV>As I am getting through this IDNO petition and charter I ran into section 9.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I then rummaged around and found nothing that suspends or cancels the existing behavior moderation protocol set forth for the GA.</DIV>
<DIV>I like the IDNOs conceptual model but actually liked the GAs more. It clearly comes down to personalities running the show, as there is no guarantee of free speech on our lists.</DIV>
<DIV>Currently I think Joe is doing just fine. But he is going to have to deal with overzealous overabundant posting. So in the meantime does anyone have an objection to my position that the rules are still in place and we should enforce them as we see fit?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Eric</DIV>
<P></P>Regards,<BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing&nbsp; (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of<BR>Information Network Eng.&nbsp; INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827<BR><!-- --></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></BODY>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>