ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] New Constituency

  • To: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] New Constituency
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=450hSAJTUevIn9x0QwRMncR3P/zKnj33XNFgzizOKJTnT1ks9WyjVoGShswYqAO3D2lqx2b8gverlN5HIB/b07xQCEr+Ff5HamHx5IB4uFAZ09vdJjWMmoW4s7eGmPlSOlvi85wEFZlxTjfMZZgv18NMWjPRamJCtFaqrqeg+CE=;
  • In-reply-to: <467A028D.F50F09F5@ix.netcom.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Very interesting comments and concepts. We should keep many options open. I am not convinced this is the most prudent way forward. Perhaps you could lay out what you believe to be the best route forward, including in some detail the steps to be taken down the road and the approach you would use to gain membership.
   
  Thank you for your continued contributions and high energy.
   
  Eric

Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  Dr. Dierker and all,

IUC.ORG seems like a good domain name for an Individual user
constituency, and my original IRC.ORG which as I recall Dr.Dierker
was in enthusiastic support of on this forum some 4 months ago, is
a good domain name for Individual Registrant Constituency. I will
be happy to register these Domain names if they are not already
taken IF our fearless leader, Dr. Eric Dierker will do the necessary
legal work for incorporating them in Delaware or California and
501 C3's.

What say you Dr. Dierker, and all? Or shall we punt and
keep on pitching bitches?

Hugh Dierker wrote:

> I believe that the GA would be well founded in commenting to the
> effect that new broad based constituencies be formed.
> It would appear that subsection 3.4 addresses this issue in relevant
> part thusly;
> Preliminary recommendations
> Emerging recommendations regarding the constituency structure
> include;
> creating 3 or 4 broad based Stakeholder Groups..... ad nauseum.
>
> http://www.icann.org/announcements/draft-wg-bgc-gnso-improvements-18jun07.pdf
>
> There is room for more than one and membership parameters would be
> at issue.
> When we began our current organization of the GA it seemed apparent
> to me that the GA would help any movement to create an IDNO
> constituency. Personally I would rather see a broader based Individual
> User constituency. In any event we should be ready to help in this
> endeavor. As I expressed earlier we should have a collective position
> and stance.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827




       
---------------------------------
You snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck
 in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>