Re: [ga] New Constituency

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dr. Dierker and all,

  Interesting response with little beef.  Where's the Beef, Dr. Dierker?

  I can only surmise that you decline my suggested starting point.
However we must start somewhere, eh?  Members will come
if they have a place to come to, which was what I suggested
below. I am sure others can do the outreach you indirectly
suggest. I gather however from your response that actually
starting and meeting the challenge which I pose, you are not
in agreement with or cannot produce the legal work necessary.
How unfortunate, another opportunity lost accordingly.

  How many more YEARS do you Dr. Dierker suggest we
discuss "options" before actually taking action? 2? 5? 20?

Hugh Dierker wrote:

>    Very interesting comments and concepts. We should keep many options
> open. I am not convinced this is the most prudent way forward. Perhaps
> you could lay out what you believe to be the best route forward,
> including in some detail the steps to be taken down the road and the
> approach you would use to gain membership.
>
>   Thank you for your continued contributions and high energy.
>
>   Eric
>
> Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   Dr. Dierker and all,
>
> IUC.ORG seems like a good domain name for an Individual user
> constituency, and my original IRC.ORG which as I recall Dr.Dierker
> was in enthusiastic support of on this forum some 4 months ago, is
> a good domain name for Individual Registrant Constituency. I will
> be happy to register these Domain names if they are not already
> taken IF our fearless leader, Dr. Eric Dierker will do the necessary
> legal work for incorporating them in Delaware or California and
> 501 C3's.
>
> What say you Dr. Dierker, and all? Or shall we punt and
> keep on pitching bitches?
>
> Hugh Dierker wrote:
>
> > I believe that the GA would be well founded in commenting to the
> > effect that new broad based constituencies be formed.
> > It would appear that subsection 3.4 addresses this issue in relevant
>
> > part thusly;
> > Preliminary recommendations
> > Emerging recommendations regarding the constituency structure
> > include;
> > creating 3 or 4 broad based Stakeholder Groups..... ad nauseum.
> >
> >
> http://www.icann.org/announcements/draft-wg-bgc-gnso-improvements-18jun07.pdf
>
> >
> > There is room for more than one and membership parameters would be
> > at issue.
> > When we began our current organization of the GA it seemed apparent
> > to me that the GA would help any movement to create an IDNO
> > constituency. Personally I would rather see a broader based
> Individual
> > User constituency. In any event we should be ready to help in this
> > endeavor. As I expressed earlier we should have a collective
> position
> > and stance.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
>
> "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
> Abraham Lincoln
>
> "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
> very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
> ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
> E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Registered Email addr with the USPS
> Contact Number: 214-244-4827
>
>
>
>
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827