<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] GA representation not a registrant constituency
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] GA representation not a registrant constituency
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=KvOcjHU30rQNoE9Ukbu5yO/NqyJ+9lA4A6cibgZqz6RGUp7wIArYZ2o29HXtPoa5zHy+SUqZ1BKA4+7e6xBmitnmORHUBDwguvdAvblU6Pagxy2s087PvJa35cOYyXR3BHCwmQaWhPNPDPea1WTS2S0+8oZG+uJshMGzSV6F+CE= ;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
While certainly a stronger unified voice coming out of the GA should benefit small registrants and certainly that is large a portion of the participating members here. However this is not about creating a registrant constituency it is about giving this list a voice.
Eric
---------------------------------
Looking for earth-friendly autos?
Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|